| Poor | Needs Improvement | Accomplished | Excellent | |
| Team work Individually marked |
Little or no
contribution to the output of the group. Poor attitude towards the task. Held the work of
the group back.
|
Fair contribution to the task. Worked acceptably with others, could have been a more active team member and enhanced the output of the group. | Good contribution to the team. Some encouragement and support to others. Accepted responsibility for own share of the work. | Fully contributed within the group. Encouraged and supported others. Ensured time and tasks were allocated fairly. Completed own tasks in exemplary fashion. Overcame barriers. |
| Process Group Marked |
Poor time management. Little or no co-ordination of the task within the group. Tasks not completed to a satisfactory level. | Time
management hindered progress. Task generally completed to a satisfactory standard. Little
evidence of a centrally co-ordinated effort. Tasks not fully completed.
|
Managed time acceptably. Made good use of all team members most of the time. Good co-ordination within the group is evident, aiding completion of the tasks. Completed all tasks in time allocated. | Clearly managed time well. Made excellent use of all team members at all times. Excellent group co-ordination of tasks, evidence that this was a success. Completed all tasks to high standard in time allocated. |
| Use of ICT (ie. Internet links, hardware + email) Group Marked |
Demonstrate low skill level. There is little or no relevant ICT use. Research is therefore poor. No attempt to email evaluation sheets or task sheet to teacher. | ICT usage not fully exploited to complete research. Limited use of email and Internet. | Some good use of ICT resources. Good research is evident. Some use of ICT for communication and other purposes. | Efficient and effective use of ICT resources. Comprehensive research apparent. ICT exploited for group communication to enhance results. |
| Presentation skills Group marked |
Use of French
is limited and inaccurate. Slides contain little information. Slides have little or no appropriate graphics and backgrounds. Design and presentation are not appealing. Choices are rarely justified. Overall impression lacks coherence. |
Some accurate
French is used. Contains slides with some relevant information. Slides contain some appropriate graphics and backgrounds. Design and presentation are not very appealing. Choices are sometimes justified Overall impression lacks finish. |
Use of French
is relevant and accurate. Contains interesting slides with much relevant information. Slides contain many appropriate graphics and backgrounds. Design and presentation are appealing. Choices are usually justified. Overall impression is of quality. |
Use of French
is relevant, accurate and ambitious. Contains slides full of information. Slides contain all appropriate graphics and backgrounds. Design and presentation are appealing. Choices are fully justified. Overall impression is of quality and professionalism. |